subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
|
|
|
Letters
[Create a New Thread]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
superb site |
Farrell, John |
Jun 09, 2004 |
Got your link through E-Skeptics. Excellent material. I find the whole Intelligent Design movement to be intellectually dishonest, to say the least, and enjoy stockpiling all excellent critiques of it.
Best,
John Farrell
|
read replies (1)
write a reply
|
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
operational definition |
Gross, Paul R. |
May 26, 2004 |
As employed *today* in biological science, "evolution" means what Darwin meant originally by "descent with modification" -- primarily through the mechanistic agency of natural selection.
PRG |
write a reply
|
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
"Is this evidence that the bible is from god?" |
Thomas, Dylan |
Apr 18, 2004 |
If one's idea of God is that He makes a fifth-digit error in calculating pi, then one has an unimaginably wonky-wonk God concept! The little calculator I picked up for free at a Wal-Mart opening does a better job!
May God save us -- from ourselves!
|
write a reply
|
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
ID Essay |
Benjamin, Ken |
Mar 28, 2004 |
I thought I would bring your attention to an article critical of
the ID arguments. Your readers might appreciate a link.
The article is:
Kenneth Einar Himma, "Design Arguments for the Existence of God," Internet
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (James Fieser, ed.); at
http://www.iep.utm.edu/d/design.htm |
read replies (1)
write a reply
|
|
Previous |
| Next
|
|