subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
|
|
|
Letters
[Create a New Thread]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
Multimedia of Reason |
Reitstoen, Ola Endre |
Mar 14, 2005 |
Hi
Just thought i should share two pages i've made, about Richard Dawkins and James Randi, both people which "talk reason".
The pages are made to share online multimedia links featuring Dawkins and Randi (and more to come in the future)
Hope you'll find it interesting :)
http://www.reitstoen.com/dawkins.php
http://www.reitstoen.com/randi.php |
write a reply
|
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
Prayer and Medical Cures |
Gaudia, Gil |
Mar 14, 2005 |
My commentary, "Searching in the Darkness: About Prayer and Medical Cures" appeared in the March 3, issue of Medscape. Perhaps you are interested;
www.medscape.com/viewarticle/498576
Gil Gaudia |
write a reply
|
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
Reply to Tremblay's argument |
Khilafah , |
Mar 03, 2005 |
:)
REASON would have me believe that I am actually playing flute to deaf ears but hey one has to try his/her best.
I should begin by stating that you are actually afraid of Harun Yahya. This is the very reason you have nt answered to his reply.
Secondly your idea of things coming into complex design and further improving after a million years is downright dumb. To quote you on that...
No, it does not seem paradoxical at all. I would like very much to hear
your argument as to why something without consciousness cannot produce
complexity, especially given millions of years.
But hey!! Why even bother. Could nt you give us a FACT or a PROOF that something without consciousness CAN produce complexity, especially given millions of years. And we would nt even have an argument in the first place!!
Like it or not... You bunch have got nothing to do with REASON... Its only faith that you are acting on..
I should say I m surprised why Harun Yahya even answered you in the first place.. But then I m surprised why I am doing the same...
BTW have you got any answers for the eye of the trilobyte dilemma that evolutionists call an oddity and dont even dare attempt to explain. Although I m sure you have no explanations for it I would still like to read your comments on it or any actual data that you may have regarding the issue. The evolutionists I met (and I ve met many) could nt give me any explanation at all.
Regards |
read replies (4)
write a reply
|
Related Article(s):
Harun Yahya Retreats to Miracles
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
Tremblay's argument |
Sharfudeen, Ashraf |
Jan 31, 2005 |
1.Can some one explain whether Tremblay considers himslef a person inflicted with the disease of Sickle Cell Anenima or a
person with high immunity to malaria ? from his own statement he says he is a person affected by Sickle Cell Anemia which has
the side effect or immunity to malaria.
2.Has Mr.Trembaly abandoned Charles Darwin , the very founding father of the concpet he is trying to defend?
His relegation of darwin as "Irreverent" on the issue of Vestigal organ simply proves that.
3.According to the mathematics of Tremblay any event in the world , how complicated it may be , can be designed by random
forces,Its probability may be low but it is certainly not Impossible since it has a probability.This kind of reasoning can be extended virtually to system , not just abt the structure of the cell.
any boy can claim , it is possible to create a Microsoft Windows Operating system by exposing a empty writable disk to heat , in the course of million of years one day the force will carve
the CD with the right number of zero and one bits in the correct places.
If he had understood the internals of Cell , he would know , it is much more complex and sophisticated than a Computer
Operating System.
4.Tremblay has acknowledged the Majesty of Natural law ,Doesnt it seem paradox that a majestic law which does such unimaginably complex thing is doing it without purpose and consciousness.
If it has consciousness, then the line of distinction between the Majesty of Natual law and the Majesty of God becomes nullified.But According to Tremblay however majestic the natual law is, it is a indeed a mad force, becuase only insane
and deranged people do things without purpose and consciousness.
4.His prentending to have understood yahya's reply cannot be taken in by mentioning the link of yahya's reply. |
read replies (4)
write a reply
|
Related Article(s):
Harun Yahya Retreats to Miracles
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
general information |
Sedory, Paul |
Mar 06, 2005 |
I have looked through your articles and not found what I am looking for and hope you can recommend an article.
I am looking for a general article to get a blindly religious person to try and be more critical. I don't necessarily want to dissuade them from their religion, just start using some critical thought. Any suggestions? |
read replies (1)
write a reply
|
|
Previous |
| Next
|
|