Title Author Date

Darwinism under the microscope by James P. Gills Hobbs , Jerry Oct 17, 2005

Has anyone reviewed the above named book by Gills and Woodward?

read replies (1)
write a reply

Title Author Date

Robert Foyle Watson, Michael Oct 13, 2005

I am having an ongoing argument with an ID supporter. Out of the blue, he comes up with this quote:

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintendent has monkeyed with the physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. I do not believe that any physicist who examined the evidence could fail to draw the inference that the laws of nuclear physics have been deliberately designed with regard to the consequences they produce within stars."

By Robert Foyle? It seems genuine and I am really struggling to argue against it...?

Help?

read replies (2)
write a reply

Title Author Date

Response to Naftali Zeligman Darfler, Benjamin Oct 17, 2005

I was wondering if Naftali Zeligman wrote his "Letter to my Rabbi" to an actual rabbi or if it was more of a rethorical device. If he sent it to an actual rabbi was there ever a response? Or, has there been an unsolicited response?

Thanks,

Ben

read replies (1)
write a reply Related Article(s):
Letter to My Rabbi

Title Author Date

No Supernatural Causes Gaudia, Gil Sep 28, 2005

Eric Murphy makes a good point in pointing out that God, ghosts and any "supernatural" phenomena can not exist in a natural world, i.e., that they are examples of as yet not explained phenomena. I would add one other point--that "supernatural" phenomena would not contain mass or energy (otherwise they would be natural phenomena)and so they could not interact with natural phenomena. How could God cause a mechanical system like a living body to change unless God was made of and employed mass or energy to bring about the change? What would the interface between the "supernatural" and the natural consist of?

read replies (2)
write a reply Related Article(s):
No supernatural causes

Title Author Date

Creationism Nunley, Colton Oct 06, 2005

Dear Talk Reason,
First let me say that I am a Creationist and I believe every word of the Bible. My reason for contacting you is this. I waould like to inform you that none of the articles on your site have any substantial evidence for the evolution theory. Would you please send to me any bit of information that is supposed to prove evolution? So far no evolutionist has been brave enough to even respond to my emails. Please email me back with your evidence if you have any.
Also, I would like to call your attention to something that you may find interesting. The Big Bang Theory could not have possibly happened. Why? I'll tell you. There is a law in physics called the Conservation of Angular Momentum. It states that if an object is spinning and breaks apart (in a frictionless environment) then all of its pieces will be spinning the same direction. Do you realize that several of the planets in our solar system are spinning backwards? Not only that but some moons also spin backwards and some travel backwards around their planet. How then can the Big Bang Theory be true?
I thank you for taking the time to read this and ask that you please respond. That is unless you are to afraid of being proven wrong by a high school student from eastern Kentucky.
Sincerely,
Colton Nunley

read replies (4)
write a reply

Previous | | Next