subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
 |
|
|
Letters
[Create a New Thread]
[Letters Index]
| Title |
Author |
Date |
| Why Coulter is Coulter |
Risner, Jeff |
Jul 27, 2006 |
Coulter objective is to sell Coulter. What she is doing is prostituting herself for 15 minutes of fame. That's a good a reason as any to turn a trick. She need's something to attack and evolution, homosexuals, the mentally ill are easy targets and usually don't fight back. She will move on to another target in her next book. Who are the ghost writers by the way?
|
write a reply
|
Related Article(s):
Secondary Addiction Part III: Ann Coulter on Evolution
|
| Title |
Author |
Date |
| Coulter III |
Zickerman, Dennis |
Jul 27, 2006 |
| A lively and well-reasoned rebuttal to Coulter's received wisdom. I look forward to Part IV. One letter writer has expressed surprise and dismay that Mr. Downard has devoted this much time and energy to Coulter's derivative ignorance. I'm not. I think it's justified because Coulter's book is a #1 best seller and it contains dangerously erroneous ideas that people (conservatives and creationists alike) will read and likely agree with--seduced (as I once was) by her rapidly wilting wit. If only she'd take time off from doing TV sound bites long enough to debate her book with scientists instead of talk show lapdogs. |
write a reply
|
Related Article(s):
Secondary Addiction Part III: Ann Coulter on Evolution
|
| Title |
Author |
Date |
| Don't mix metaphors |
Paul |
Jul 25, 2006 |
As long as we're being smarmy, inappropriate and indirect: Didn't you mean to be painted with a brush rather than tarred with it?
--Jay June
|
read replies (1)
write a reply
|
Related Article(s):
The DEMBSKI ALERT
|
| Title |
Author |
Date |
| as usual lots of coulds, and ifs from evolutionists... |
Tom |
Jul 11, 2006 |
you miss her best point, is there ANYTHING that could disprove your beloved theory (god) of evolution?
There is nothing you don't have an answer for, or some chance of explantion, if by man iterations that COULD, just COULD have happened, just so you don't have to abandon your beloved darwinwism!! talk about Darwiniacs....you seem to be one.
I have a question that I have never gotten an answer for. What is the mathematical formula for evolution? how do you measure this MASSIVE ALL PERVASIVE POWER that influences all live at all times?? And why hasn't the coelecanth evolved? I expect its reached it perfect niche, whatever that is and no longer needs to evolve to survive. Look like 'evolution' is selective, ie evolution is god.
and explain how evolution evolved both sexes about the same time, and evolved both sexes in all sorts of animals, so there would be a male and female of each type...I know, there is a 'chance' anything could have happened.....yeah..... |
read replies (8)
write a reply
|
Related Article(s):
Secondary Addiction: Ann Coulter on Evolution
|
Previous |
| Next
|
|
