subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
![](/img/blank.gif) |
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
? |
Ryan |
Jul 29, 2006
|
I feel there is a great deal of circular reasoning in this article. Observational science and historical science are not the same thing. The Cambrian Explosion; where is all the fossil evidence for evolution.
How many thousands of generations of evolution and all the fossils of the so-called "links" of human evolution can fit in a small box. Who is misinterpreting data? Open your mind. Look objectively at the evidence as a whole. You have a great deal of faith in what you believe because your facts (data) were severely lacking.
Before the universe was nothing, not a quantum vacumn...nothing...absolute nothing. "Anything that exists has a cause that has brought it into being". Stop being so obstinate.
|
Related Articles: |
Religion and skepticism: can (and should!) skeptics challenge religion?
|
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |