Home| Letters| Links| RSS| About Us| Contact Us

On the Frontline

What's New

Table of Contents

Index of Authors

Index of Titles

Index of Letters

Mailing List


subscribe to our mailing list:



SECTIONS

Critique of Intelligent Design

Evolution vs. Creationism

The Art of ID Stuntmen

Faith vs Reason

Anthropic Principle

Autopsy of the Bible code

Science and Religion

Historical Notes

Counter-Apologetics

Serious Notions with a Smile

Miscellaneous

Letter Serial Correlation

Mark Perakh's Web Site

Letters

[Write a Reply] [Letters Index]

Title Author Date
What about it? RJDownard@aol.com Jul 16, 2006
While part of the Intelligent Design mantra is that evolutionists insulate their maerialistic philosophy from pontential refutation, this isn't really Coulter's argument.

She is convinced that evolution is plainly confuted by the scientific evidence. She is astoundingly wrong in this belief, as I have noted and will continue to explain in subsequent posts.

And one may note a new wrinkle: Bill Dembski's non-reply to my Coulter inquiries, posted at his Uncommon Descent blog site.
Related Articles: Secondary Addiction: Ann Coulter on Evolution

Title Author Date
What about it? Norowitz, Avi Jul 16, 2006
Douglas Theobald has provided numerous potential methods of falsifying evolution.

Related Articles: Secondary Addiction: Ann Coulter on Evolution