subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |
![](/img/blank.gif) |
![](/img/blank.gif) |
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
Coulter mangles Dover case |
Burke , Pat |
Jun 27, 2006
|
Living in a country (look north, USA) where presumably Coulter would be classified as a Hate Crime, it boggles the mind how she (and her ilk) can get away with it. Is this not akin to falsely screaming "FIRE" in a crowded theater, trancending reasonable limits to free speach, as the Right is often wont to harp upon. These "people" elevate hyperbole to an artless form. They must all be closet Atheists. If they believe in their god, truth, beauty and justice, they have to believe they are going to hell.
|
Related Articles: |
Coulter mangles Dover case
|
Title |
Author |
Date |
Coulter mangles Dover case |
Watson, Tim |
Jul 10, 2006
|
I am pleased that the author of "Coulter Mangles Dover Case" acknowledges that one need not consider oneself a "liberal" to understand that
evolutionary science is the foundation of all biology and much other science, and is certainly correct, and to abhor Ann Coulter's raving
nonsense. This issue has nothing to do with politics - or a debate between "conservatives" and "liberals" - but is really a debate over the scientific method and ignorance. I would venture that the vast majority of those
Americans who do not hold a leftist political or economic viewpoint (such as me) and who are reasonably well-educated (most of us) accept evolution as fact. It is good to remember that, and to avoid portraying Ann Coulter as a spokesman for the "right" or of The Evil George W. Bush. There is plenty of willful ignorance on the left to keep it humble, one would think.
Thanks for your insights.
Tim Watson
|
Related Articles: |
Coulter mangles Dover case
|
|
![](/img/blank.gif) |