subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
 |
|
|
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
| Title |
Author |
Date |
| mark perakh's critique of gerald schroeder |
Rowe, Daniel |
Nov 20, 2005
|
i was fascinated by the critique. 'Not a very Big Bang about Genesis'. I emailed schroeder the article, and he gave an intitial response to it. I was wondering what Dr Perrakh, or perhaps some other correspondantof yours had to say to this response.
Many thanks
Daniel
The major error in the critique as I skimmed it is that the author seems to think I use general or special relativity to match the 6 fays to 15 billion yrs. I do not as is clear from the text. and In SOG I make it clear that is is red shifting and blue shifting due to stretching of space. And it is the Bible's point of view, not God's. That is the one sentence I would change in G&BB where I state God's view of time. I should have written the Bible's view. The view form the beginning is set by the Ramban on his commentary on Day One, rather than a first day.
Gerry
|
| Related Articles: |
Not a Very Big Bang about Genesis
|
|
|
